Reporting to leadership
Reporting isn’t a box-ticking exercise — it’s the heartbeat of modern demand gen. When marketing owns a revenue number, reporting becomes how you align teams, spot revenue before it arrives, diagnose funnel issues, and defend the work that actually moves pipeline. This module teaches you how to turn scattered metrics into clear stories that drive action, investment, and growth.
Course Details:
4 lessons
55 minutes
Intermediate

Introduction: Why reporting is your unfair advantage
Most marketers think of reporting as the thing you do at the end. End of month. End of quarter. End of campaign. A backwards-looking recap.
But in a modern demand gen motion, especially when marketing is accountable for a revenue number, reporting is the thing that sits in the middle of everything:
- It keeps marketing, sales, RevOps, and finance aligned on one definition of success.
- It turns a messy mix of channel metrics, attribution models, and anecdotes into a single story leadership can act on.
- And it’s how you protect investment in the work that actually moves pipeline, not just what’s easy to measure.
At Cognism, marketing is responsible for over 50% of total revenue. That changes how you report. It’s not enough to say, “We generated X MQLs” or “Our CTR improved 20%.” Reporting has to show:
- Where future revenue is likely to come from (leading indicators).
- Where deals are falling out of the funnel (diagnosis).
- And what you’re going to do about it (recommendations).
This module is about building that kind of reporting muscle. You’ll learn how to:
- Move from raw metrics to useful meaning.
- Build a reporting rhythm that keeps teams honest without sending them into panic mode every week.
- Tell different versions of the same story for different stakeholders – without changing the facts.
- Use data to make a compelling case for budget, headcount, or strategic change.
If you want marketing to be treated as a core growth engine, not a line item, this is where it becomes real.
Lesson 1: From Metrics to Meaning
Why this lesson matters
It’s easy to fill a deck with:
- Impressions
- CTRs
- Form fills
- Webinar registrations
They might tell you that something is happening, e.g. people are seeing things, clicking things, signing up for things, but they don’t tell you whether those actions are turning into qualified pipeline, closed-won deals, or sustainable growth. You can have campaigns that look brilliant in-platform and still miss your revenue target.
This lesson is about building reporting that answers a more important question: “Is what we’re doing creating sustainable revenue momentum?”
To get there, you need three things:
- Alignment on your north star
Everyone - marketing, sales, RevOps, finance - has to agree that the primary measure of success is revenue and pipeline contribution, not leads for the sake of leads.
- A full-funnel view
You can’t stop at form fills. You need visibility from first touch, to MQL, to meeting booked, to opportunity, to closed-won, and you need to know what “good” looks like at each stage for your business.
- A way of turning numbers into narrative
Data alone doesn’t change behaviour. You need simple, repeatable ways of turning metrics into meaning: what happened, why it happened, and what you’re going to do about it.
By the end of this lesson, you’ll be able to look at a set of metrics and tell a coherent story: where you’re winning, where you’re leaking revenue, and which levers to pull next.
What “good” reporting looks like when marketing owns revenue
The goal of reporting isn’t to justify activity (“we ran X campaigns”), but to demonstrate impact.
Good reporting proves that marketing is an investment with measurable return - driving qualified pipeline, accelerating deal velocity, and improving efficiency over time.
When you show that marketing consistently contributes a defined percentage of revenue, and can explain how, you move the conversation from “what did we spend?” to “how do we scale this impact?”
In traditional lead-gen reporting, success is measured by the number of leads or MQLs generated. But in a modern demand gen motion, those are simply inputs, not outcomes.
Marketing’s true performance is judged on:
- Pipeline contribution: How much qualified pipeline originated from or was influenced by marketing.
- Revenue contribution: The share of closed-won deals marketing helped generate.
- Efficiency: Pipeline per £1 spent, or marketing payback period.
When those become your core metrics, everything else - engagement rates, CPLs, CTRs - becomes supporting evidence, not the main story.
Reporting for one revenue team
Marketing, Sales, RevOps, and Finance must all be able to look at the same data and tell the same story. That means:
- One shared data source (e.g., Salesforce, Pigment) where everyone pulls numbers from.
- Unified definitions for key metrics (e.g., what counts as a meeting held or opportunity created).
- A consistent narrative framework, so that the CMO, CRO, and CFO can each see the same trends through their own lens.
When everyone’s operating from the same “truth,” reporting moves from debate (“whose numbers are right?”) to diagnosis (“what’s really driving the outcome?”).
How to structure reporting when marketing owns revenue
Good reporting works backwards from business outcomes to activity:
1. Start with the target:
- What’s the revenue or pipeline goal for this period?
- What share is marketing accountable for?
2. Work backwards through the funnel:
- What MQL and opportunity volume do we need to reach that goal?
- Are conversion rates holding steady or changing?
- Which channels or campaigns are contributing most efficiently?
3. Use in-platform metrics as proof points, not the story:
- CTR, CPC, and engagement rates are context for diagnosing performance - not success metrics in themselves.
- Example: “CTR rose by 30%” is interesting; “CTR rose by 30% and drove a 20% increase in mid-market demo requests” is meaningful.
The four questions great reporting always answers
1. Are we pacing to target?
- Are we on track to hit our pipeline and revenue goals?
- What’s trending above or below expectation?
2. Where is performance strongest or weakest?
- Which regions, segments, or channels are outperforming or underperforming?
- Where can we reallocate budget or resources to maximise impact?
- What’s new in the data that leadership should know?
- What external or internal factors explain those changes?
4. What are we going to do differently as a result?
- Every report should end with next steps, experiments, or corrective actions tied to the insights.
The golden rule: If it doesn’t lead to a decision or an action, it’s just a dashboard screenshot.
The Metrics → Meaning framework
To stop reports becoming data dumps, we use a simple structure:
1. Metric: What happened?
- The data point: “MQL-to-opportunity conversion dropped from 22% to 16% in EMEA.”
2. Insight: Why did it happen?
- Interpretation: “Drop is concentrated in mid-market accounts. Speed-to-lead has slipped; 47% of demos are booked more than 5 days out.”
3. Context: What’s normal?
- Benchmark/trend: “Historically, MM EMEA holds 21–23% conversion with demos scheduled within 2–3 days.”
4. Recommendation: What should we do next?
- Action: “Increase AE availability within 48 hours for mid-market inbound; test routing logic and add an earlier reminder sequence.”
Every important slide or section should be able to fit into that pattern.
Aligning on benchmarks
We use three types of benchmarks:
1. Best in class- External references or ideal state.
- Helps set long-term ambition (e.g., what a world-class funnel could look like).
2. Historical
- Your own performance over time.
- Answers: “What do we already know we can do?”
3. Next best
- The realistic near-term step between where you are now and “best in class.”
- This is what you hold yourself accountable to each quarter.
Instead of saying, “Mid-market opportunity rate is low vs industry benchmarks,” a better story is:
“Mid-market opp rate is 5 points below our proven baseline. Here’s how we plan to close that gap over the next quarter.”
That’s actionable. And it respects how your business actually operates.
Building full-funnel visibility
When marketing owns revenue contribution, you can’t stop at the MQL. And before I go any further… let me define what I mean by MQL:
An MQL (Marketing Qualified Lead) is a prospect who has shown clear intent or engagement strong enough to indicate they’re ready for a conversation with sales.
At Cognism, this isn’t based on arbitrary scores or gated content downloads, it’s rooted in real buying intent.
Our definition: An MQL is a hand-raiser. Someone who explicitly requests to speak to sales, typically through a demo request, pricing form, or chat interaction that signals in-market intent.
This definition aligns marketing with revenue by ensuring MQLs are:
- High intent: They’ve moved beyond awareness and are actively exploring solutions.
- Sales-ready: They meet basic ICP criteria (company size, region, role) and are likely to convert to a meeting.
- Measurable: Every MQL can be traced through to pipeline and revenue contribution.
Measuring how many people filled in a form or booked a demo tells you very little without context on what happened before and after. Real visibility means understanding the entire journey, from first touch to revenue, and how every stage connects.
Think of it as shifting from a snapshot to a storyline.
Pre-MQL (leading indicators)
These are the early signals that show whether your programs are creating future demand. They tell you if the right people are engaging in the right places, long before they’re ready to buy.
- Quality of traffic: Who’s coming to your site? Are they ICP-fit accounts from your key regions or just noise? A rise in traffic means little if it’s the wrong audience.
- Engagement with key assets and pages: Which topics and formats actually resonate? Look at scroll depth, time on page, content downloads, and return visits.
- Platform metrics on create-demand plays: Metrics like video watch time, saves, or meaningful comments on LinkedIn are indicators that your message is landing — not vanity metrics when viewed through the right lens.
- Account-level engagement scores (at Cognism, we use Dreamdata): These show which companies are actively researching your category. It’s an early sign that demand is building, even before a single form is filled.
The goal at this stage isn’t conversion — it’s momentum. You’re tracking signals that your ideal audience is moving closer to being in-market.
Post-MQL (lagging indicators)
Once someone raises their hand, the focus shifts to conversion efficiency. This is where you see whether all that early engagement is translating into real pipeline and revenue.
- MQL → meeting booked → meeting held → opportunity → closed-won: These are your core funnel stages. Monitoring conversion rates between each step helps pinpoint where you’re losing potential deals.
- Conversion by region, segment, and motion: SMB and enterprise funnels look different. So do inbound and outbound. Breaking this down helps you find systemic issues versus one-off anomalies.
- Speed to lead: How quickly does sales respond after an MQL is created? Even small delays (e.g., waiting more than 48 hours) can tank conversion rates.
- Pipeline velocity and win rates: How fast are opportunities progressing, and how many are actually closing? Together, they show the health of your revenue engine.
Bringing it together
True full-funnel visibility means connecting these leading and lagging indicators into one cohesive picture.
In practice, that means:
- Marketing doesn’t just hand off MQLs and walk away. They track how those MQLs progress and diagnose why certain campaigns produce stronger conversion rates than others.
- RevOps doesn’t diagnose problems in isolation. Instead of looking at Salesforce or pipeline data in a vacuum, they collaborate with marketing to understand the context behind changes in quality or volume.
- Everyone is looking at the same funnel, from first touch to revenue, in a shared toolset. Whether that’s Salesforce, Looker, Pigment, or Dreamdata — the data lives in one connected ecosystem.
When that happens, reporting stops being about proving value and starts being about improving performance. You move from “what happened” to “what’s next.”
Course homework
Choose one recent monthly or quarterly marketing report. Then:
1. Rewrite the headlines using the Metrics → Meaning framework.
- For 3–5 key metrics, write: metric, insight, context, recommendation.
2. Define your benchmarks.
- For each stage (MQL, opp, pipeline, revenue), note:
- Your 6–12 month historical range.
- Your “next best” target for the next 1–2 quarters.
3. Add a full-funnel view.
- On a single slide or page, map:
- Pre-MQL indicators you track.
- Post-MQL funnel stages.
- Highlight in red the stage you believe is currently the weakest.
Bring this into Lesson 2 – it’ll make the cadence work much easier.
Lesson 2: Reporting cadence & rhythm
Why this lesson matters
Most teams fall into one of two traps:
- Over-reporting: They check dashboards daily, chasing every fluctuation in spend, impressions, or conversions. This constant analysis creates noise, distracts from strategy, and leads to reactive decision-making. People start optimising for the week, or even the day, instead of building sustainable revenue momentum.
- Under-reporting: They only review performance at the end of the month or quarter, when the numbers are already baked in. By the time a problem is spotted, for example, a drop in conversion rate or pipeline pacing, it’s too late to course-correct.
Finding a balance between the two to ensure you have oversight on progress, without getting misled with too small of a snapshot. This lesson is about building that rhythm.
At Cognism, the team has learned that consistency beats intensity. A solid cadence ensures that data is being used to guide strategy, not to fuel anxiety.
You’ll learn how to:
- Design a reporting rhythm that fits your business cadence, weekly, monthly, and quarterly check-ins that each serve a specific purpose.
- Separate operational reporting (real-time problem solving) from strategic reporting (trend analysis and planning).
- Build cross-functional reporting moments that keep marketing, sales, and RevOps aligned on the same metrics, definitions, and narratives.
- Use leading and lagging indicators to maintain forward-looking visibility, knowing not just what happened, but what’s likely to happen next.
The Cognism cadence
Operational reporting
Operational reporting is about now. It answers the question: “Is everything working as it should this week?”
These reports focus on leading indicators - the early signals that help you catch problems before they snowball. They’re tactical, concise, and action-oriented.
Example metrics:
- Traffic and engagement pacing
- Spend vs. plan and channel efficiency
- MQL volume and quality
- Obvious anomalies in key channels (e.g., CTR or conversion drops)
For us, these are weekly “temperature check” meetings between Marketing and MarOps.
- Short, sharp sessions (20–30 mins) focused on identifying and fixing anything off-track.
- No deep dives or lengthy decks, just enough visibility to tweak campaigns, budgets, or follow-up processes in real time.
Strategic reporting: steering the direction
Strategic reporting looks at the bigger picture. It answers the question: “Are we still heading in the right direction?”
It focuses on lagging indicators - pipeline, revenue, ROI, and long-term trends, and is where leadership alignment and decision-making happen.
Example metrics:
- Marketing’s pipeline and revenue contribution
- Conversion rates through the full funnel
- Channel and regional efficiency (pipeline per £1, CAC, payback)
- ROI trends and investment mix
Typical rhythm:
- Monthly reviews - “Did the engine work?”
- Evaluate full-funnel performance and diagnose the story behind the numbers.
- Discuss learnings from campaigns, ICP fit, and conversion efficiency.
- Adjust short-term tactics or budgets based on evidence.
- Quarterly reviews - “Are we still pointed in the right direction?”
- Step back to assess strategy, market shifts, and long-term ROI.
- Identify what to double down on, what to stop, and where to experiment next.
How the balance works in practice
At Cognism, we think of it like this:
|
Cadence |
Type |
Focus |
Primary Question |
Output |
|
Weekly |
Operational |
Leading indicators |
“Is anything broken?” |
Quick fixes, small optimisations |
|
Monthly |
Strategic |
Funnel performance |
“Did the engine work?” |
Diagnosis and next-month actions |
|
Quarterly |
Strategic |
Trends & direction |
“Are we still heading the right way?” |
Strategic bets and re-prioritisation |
Pre-MQL vs Post-MQL meetings
One of the biggest unlocks in Cognism’s reporting rhythm was splitting performance reviews into two distinct meetings - one focused on creating demand, and one on converting it.
When marketing owns a revenue number, this separation is essential. Otherwise, teams end up treating every bad month the same way, when in reality, low results might stem from volume problems (not enough qualified demand being generated) or conversion problems (good leads not being worked effectively).
By dividing reporting along these lines, you can diagnose issues faster, assign ownership clearly, and avoid misdirected fixes.
Pre-MQL meeting (marketing-led)
Purpose: “What’s driving (or blocking) MQL volume?”
This is a marketing-owned session focused on the health of demand creation, everything that happens before someone raises their hand. It’s where the team analyses early-stage signals to understand if campaigns are on track to generate the right kind of in-market interest.
Typical attendees:
- Demand generation and campaign managers
- Paid and organic channel owners
- Marketing operations
- RevOps (to validate data accuracy and pacing)
Key focus areas:
- Paid performance: Are campaigns delivering the expected reach, engagement, and cost efficiencies? Are we spending in the right places, and are those clicks from the right audiences?
- Creative and messaging: What’s resonating in ads, videos, or social? Which narratives are driving meaningful engagement, saves, or comments?
- Content engagement: Which assets, topics, or formats are attracting ICP-fit visitors? How are web journeys performing (scroll depth, time on page, repeat visits)?
- Top-of-funnel experiments: What tests are we running to expand reach or improve engagement (new channels, formats, or audience segments)?
Post-MQL meeting (cross-functional)
Purpose: “What happens after someone raises their hand?”
This is a cross-functional session between marketing, sales, and RevOps - focused on how effectively qualified demand is converting into meetings, opportunities, and pipeline.
Typical attendees:
- Marketing leadership
- Sales leaders (SDR/AE managers)
- RevOps / Sales Ops
- Occasionally finance or regional heads (for context on performance)
Key focus areas:
- Speed-to-lead: How quickly are MQLs being picked up after a form fill or chatbot interaction? Is response time impacting conversion?
- Demo scheduling and no-shows: Are prospects booking within an optimal window (1–3 days)? What percentage cancel or don’t attend?
- Conversion diagnostics: How do MQL → meeting → opportunity → closed-won rates differ by region, segment, and motion (inbound vs. outbound)?
- Process quality: Are handover workflows smooth? Are there technical or operational blockers in Salesforce, Drift, or routing logic?
The Post-MQL meeting focuses on conversion efficiency, not volume. It’s about identifying friction points that slow down revenue, and assigning clear owners to fix them.
Why the split matters
Keeping Pre- and Post-MQL reporting separate helps everyone stay focused on what they can actually control:
|
Problem Type |
Common Symptoms |
Meeting |
Who Owns It |
Example Fix |
|
Volume issue |
Not enough MQLs, drop in traffic or engagement |
Pre-MQL |
Marketing |
Rebalance spend, refresh creative, run new TOFU experiments |
|
Conversion issue |
MQLs generated but not converting |
Post-MQL |
Sales & RevOps (with marketing support) |
Improve speed-to-lead, audit handoff process, enforce follow-up SLAs |
Without this separation, teams often blur the two - tweaking ads when the real issue is SDR response time, or rebuilding sales cadences when the real problem is top-of-funnel engagement.
Your reporting rhythm should help you see clearly which problem you’re solving, and bring the right people to the table to solve it.
Building the source of truth
A great reporting rhythm is worthless if nobody trusts the numbers behind it. The moment marketing, sales, or finance start questioning which version of a number is right, reporting stops being a tool for action.
That’s why one of the most important principles at Cognism is having a single source of truth for all revenue reporting.
- Everyone pulls metrics from the same system.
- Everyone understands how those metrics are defined.
- Every report can be traced back to one dataset and one owner.
It removes ambiguity and lets discussions focus on why performance looks the way it does, not whether the numbers are real.
How Cognism structures its data foundation
We use Salesforce as our core system of record, the data foundation that everything else feeds from.
From there, different tools serve specific roles in our reporting ecosystem:
- Pigment → Used for financial planning, revenue forecasting, and topline dashboards.
- It connects to Salesforce to give leadership real-time visibility on pipeline, ARR, and marketing’s revenue contribution.
- Dreamdata → Used for multi-touch attribution and journey insights.
- It helps us understand how different marketing activities contribute to pipeline creation and acceleration, without relying on single-touch models.
This setup ensures everyone — from marketing and RevOps to finance and leadership — is looking at the same numbers, just through different lenses depending on their role.
Before we debate ‘why’, we sanity-check ‘what’
Even with a strong foundation, mistakes happen - sync delays, naming inconsistencies, human error. That’s why every performance discussion at Cognism starts with a quick sense-check:
- Does the number make sense? Is it in line with historical trends and logical expectations?
- Does it match what other teams are seeing? Is marketing’s pipeline number the same as RevOps’ or finance’s?
- If not, what’s the issue? Is it a data hygiene problem (e.g., duplicate records, mis-tagged campaigns)? Or a real performance problem that needs to be addressed?
This habit keeps conversations productive, and ensures that when teams discuss performance, they’re working from fact, not speculation.
Course homework
Design a reporting rhythm for your own team.
1. Map your weekly, monthly, and quarterly touchpoints.
- For each, define:
- Purpose.
- Attendees.
- 3–5 questions that must be answered.
2. Separate “volume” and “conversion” conversations.
- Outline one Pre-MQL meeting and one Post-MQL meeting.
- List the metrics each will own.
3. Define your source of truth.
- Note which tools/dashboards are definitive for:
- Funnel metrics.
- Revenue contribution.
- Attribution/journeys.
-
- If you currently have multiple conflicting reports, write one action you’ll take to consolidate.
Lesson 3: Storytelling for Stakeholders
Why this lesson matters
Data on its own doesn’t change decisions, stories do.
The same numbers can lead to completely different conclusions depending on how you frame them. A dip in conversions can sound like a crisis in one report and a learning opportunity in another. A 20% increase in spend can look wasteful to finance or like a smart reinvestment to a CMO, it all depends on how clearly and credibly you connect the dots.
That’s why good reporting isn’t just about showing data - it’s about making data meaningful.
When marketing owns a revenue number, the goal of reporting is not to impress stakeholders with graphs, but to help them make better decisions. That means learning to:
- Translate performance into the right language for each stakeholder.
Sales wants to know what’s helping them hit quota. Finance wants to understand efficiency and ROI. Leadership wants confidence that marketing is building sustainable growth. The job of the storyteller is to bridge those perspectives using the same set of facts. - Make it impossible to ignore the real problems and the real wins.
Don’t bury the headline. Great storytelling brings clarity, it highlights what matters most, why it’s happening, and what’s being done about it. - Avoid attribution fights and focus on shared outcomes.
Strong storytelling shifts the conversation from “Who sourced this?” to “How do we get more of what works?”
In this lesson, we’ll explore how to take the data you already have, campaign results, funnel metrics, pipeline impact, and turn it into clear, tailored narratives that resonate with each audience.
Tailoring the story
Once you have a solid set of metrics, the next step is learning how to communicate them differently to each audience.
VP Sales
Cares about:
- Conversion rates through the funnel (MQL → meeting → opp → closed-won)
- Deal velocity and speed-to-lead
- Meeting show rates and pipeline coverage
Wants to know: “Is marketing bringing in the right opportunities, and how can we tighten the funnel together?”
The sales leader doesn’t need to see ad CTRs or impressions, they want clarity on how marketing performance translates into sales productivity.
Frame your story around how marketing’s work supports their targets:
- “MQL-to-opportunity conversion is up 8% since we tightened qualification criteria.”
- “Mid-market demo requests are pacing 20% above target — let’s ensure we have AE capacity to meet demand.”
CMO / Marketing Leadership
Cares about:
- Efficiency: pipeline per £1 spent, CAC, payback period
- Channel ROI and portfolio balance (brand vs capture, organic vs paid)
- What’s working, what’s not, and what’s being learned
Wants to know: “Where are we getting the best return, and where should we redeploy budget?”
Here, the narrative is about effectiveness and prioritisation. The CMO wants confidence that marketing spend is moving the business forward, not just driving short-term metrics.
Frame your story around learnings and decisions:
- “LinkedIn brand campaigns influenced 40% of new pipeline last quarter. We’ll increase investment here and scale down low-efficiency retargeting.”
- “Organic reach is declining, but engagement from ICP-fit accounts is growing — we’ll double down on thought leadership formats.”
This version of the story proves marketing knows how to allocate investment intelligently and continuously improve performance.
CEO / CFO / Board
Cares about:
- Revenue growth, profitability, and predictability
- Efficiency trends over time (marketing ROI, cost per opp, payback period)
- The long-term sustainability of pipeline creation
Wants to know: “Is marketing delivering its share of revenue, and is that share becoming more efficient over time?”
Executives don’t need the granular breakdown of campaigns, they need clarity and confidence.
Frame your story around business outcomes and risk mitigation:
- “Marketing contributed 52% of closed-won revenue this quarter, up from 46% last quarter.”
- “Our cost to create £1 of pipeline has decreased by 14%, driven by improved mid-market efficiency.”
- “Even though website traffic is down 30%, direct demo requests and brand searches are up, a sign of stronger off-site brand influence.”
This gives leadership assurance that marketing is not just hitting goals, but scaling sustainably.
The Cognism narrative reporting structure
For leadership-level reports, we use a simple memo structure:
1. Executive summary
- 3–5 bullet headlines.
- Example: “Marketing contributed 54% of closed-won revenue this quarter, up from 48% last quarter, driven by improved paid efficiency and stronger MM performance.”
2. Key metrics vs targets
- Revenue and pipeline contribution vs plan.
- Funnel metrics for context.
3. Insights + recommendations
- The “so what?” from the data.
- The actions you’re proposing (not a long list of maybes).
4. Business impact
- How this affects revenue, efficiency, and risk.
- What happens if you don’t act.
In practice, this might look like a 1-2 page memo, supported by a small number of charts, not 40 slides of screenshots.
Course homework
Pick one upcoming stakeholder report (monthly marketing review, board update, etc.).
1. Draft a one-page narrative.
- Use the structure: Executive summary → Key metrics → Insights & recommendations → Business impact.
2. Write three tailored intros for different audiences.
- One for VP Sales.
- One for CMO / marketing leadership.
- One for CEO/CFO.
- Each intro should be 3–4 sentences, using language they care about.
3. Stress-test with a “neutral” lens.
- Pretend you’re RevOps.
- Add comments where your story feels biased, under-explained, or light on evidence.
- Rewrite at least one section to be more balanced.
Lesson 4: Making the Case for Investment
Why this lesson matters
The best reports don’t stop at explaining performance. They use data to direct it. When marketing owns a revenue number, every dashboard, insight, and meeting should help the business decide where to place its next bet.
That might mean:
- More budget for the channels that are consistently driving qualified pipeline and revenue.
- New headcount in the functions that will unlock the next stage of growth, whether that’s paid media, RevOps, or content.
- Strategic shifts away from activities that look good in-platform but don’t translate to deals.
In other words, reporting should be the engine of prioritisation.
Combining quantitative + qualitative
Hard numbers get you in the room. Context and story get your investment approved.
Use both:
Quantitative
- MQL, opp, and revenue contribution.
- Conversion rates and funnel health by motion and segment.
- ROI by channel / program (pipeline per £1, CAC, payback).
Qualitative
- Sales feedback: “We’re hearing Cognism everywhere” vs. “Nobody’s heard of us in this region.” These real-world anecdotes validate what the data hints at — whether brand awareness is truly growing or demand is softening in key markets.
- Performance of content themes: Which narratives or topics are sparking the most engagement in live events, chat interactions, and community discussions? These are leading indicators of where the market’s attention — and future revenue — is heading.
- Buyer behaviour shifts: Are research cycles getting longer? Are prospects asking for pricing earlier? Are more people finding you through AI platforms or referrals? Insights like these help explain why certain channels or campaigns are performing the way they are.
Together, they show how marketing is influencing revenue, not just whether it did.
Using journey data directionally
Multi-touch tools like Dreamdata won’t give you perfect truth, but they will show you patterns.
Examples of useful journey insights:
- “68% of won deals touched at least three marketing channels before converting.”
- “Accounts exposed to our brand campaigns close 30% faster and at higher ACV.”
- “Paid social is present in 40% of new revenue journeys, even when it’s not last-touch.”
The key:
- Don’t weaponise attribution to argue over credit.
- Use it directionally to support stronger investment in the plays that appear again and again in winning journeys.
Turning reports into business cases
Once you’ve analysed performance, your next step is turning that insight into a business case for action, one that leadership can quickly understand, trust, and approve.
A good report should never end at “here’s what happened.” It should clearly show “here’s what we’re going to do next, and what impact it will have.”
To make that happen, Cognism uses a simple, repeatable structure: Challenge → Diagnosis → Action → Impact
This framework transforms your data from a retrospective into a plan, helping you move from reporting to recommending.
1. Challenge: Define the problem clearly
Start by stating the business issue in simple, measurable terms. Keep it factual and outcome-oriented, not emotional or speculative.
“Mid-market pipeline is 25% below plan in EMEA.”
The goal here is to make the challenge instantly recognisable to leadership. Don’t hide behind jargon or overcomplication, this opening line should make everyone in the room sit up and say, “Yes, that’s a problem worth solving.”
A clear challenge sets the direction for your entire case.
2. Diagnosis: Use data to explain why
Once the challenge is defined, use your reporting data to dig into the root cause. This is where you connect the dots between metrics, context, and behaviour.
For example:
“Pre-MQL indicators show healthy engagement, but MQL → meeting conversion has dropped. Speed-to-lead has slipped; 52% of meetings are being booked more than 5 days out.”
The diagnosis should be supported by both quantitative and qualitative insight — combining hard metrics (conversion rates, velocity, ROI) with human feedback (sales notes, buyer comments, tool insights).
This step matters most because it shifts the conversation from symptom to source. Leadership can’t back every problem, but they will back one that’s been properly understood.
3. Action: Recommend a specific fix
Next, outline exactly what you’re proposing to do about it. Be concrete. Vague recommendations (“we should test more campaigns” or “improve follow-up”) don’t get approved, actionable ones do.
“Add one inbound SDR for EMEA MM, enforce calendar availability SLAs, and refresh mid-market paid capture campaigns.”
A good action plan should:
- Be specific enough to cost and resource.
- Include owners (who will do what).
- Be feasible within current systems and timelines.
This is the part of the report that converts insight into execution. It tells leadership: we know the issue, we’ve thought through the fix, and we’re ready to act on it.
4. Impact: Quantify the expected outcome
Finally, translate your recommendation into business impact. Use historical data or benchmarks to project what will happen if your proposal is implemented.
“Based on historical conversion, this should recover ~£X in quarterly pipeline and ~£Y in revenue, bringing MM EMEA back within 5% of target.”
By linking your actions directly to potential revenue outcomes, you make the case not just logical, but financially compelling.
If possible, also show what happens if the issue isn’t addressed (lost revenue, pipeline risk, continued inefficiency). Framing the opportunity cost can be just as persuasive as showing potential gain.
Course homework
Choose one strategic ask you’d like to make in the next 3–6 months (e.g., extra paid budget, a new hire, or a campaign bet).
1. Draft your 1-page business case.
- Use: Challenge → Diagnosis → Action → Impact.
2. Add 3–5 proof points.
- At least 2 quantitative (numbers).
- At least 1 qualitative (sales/buyer feedback, journey insights).
3. Write a 3-sentence version.
- This is the version you’d say if you had 60 seconds with your CEO.
- It should clearly state what you want and why it’s the most sensible use of budget.
Fran & Simon
Fran leads Cognism’s demand gen engine, owning a revenue number, not just an MQL target, which means reporting is how she proves that marketing isn’t a cost centre, it’s a growth driver.
Simon leads marketing operations and acts as the “neutral brain” for go-to-market performance. His world is data models, dashboards, and forecasting, but his real job is turning numbers into decisions the whole revenue team can trust.
Together, they’ve built a reporting motion where marketing consistently contributes more than half of Cognism’s total revenue, and can prove it.
Ready to put it into practice?
Test what you’ve learned with this quick interactive quiz. Check your knowledge and see how ready you are to apply it.
